Diversity of three ant guilds in shade and sun coffee plantations and forests of Risaralda

https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v31i1.9422
Coffee management Myrmecofauna Winkler Agroecosystem Conservation

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español)

Published: Jan 15, 2005
Issue: Vol. 31 No. 1 (2005)
Section Agriculture / Research paper

Publcation metrics

288




 


Main Article Content

Authors

LEONARDO RIVERA Universidad del Valle, Departamento de Biología
INGE ARMBRECHT Universidad del Valle, Departamento de Biología
Abstract

During 2001-2002, a study on the myrmecofauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in coffee plantations was conducted int the Apía municipality (Risaralda) in order to evaluate the impact of modern agricultural practices on the associated biodiversity. Twelve coffee farms were selected and classified into three shade managements (treatments) and a control consisting of forest patches. Twenty 1m2 -plots were located on each farm and at each plot ants were collected manually and with a mini-Winkler from the leaf litter. Ants were also sampled from the nearest coffee bush. Finally, biotic and abiotic variables in the area were measured. The ants were grouped into guilds according to the classification of Delabie et al. for South America. A total of 22.983 individuals belonging to 115 morphospecies was recorded. Polygeneric shaded coffee (organic managed coffee) had the greatest species richness. Ants were grouped into three guilds: cryptic litter-dwelling, abundant and coffee bush. The cryptic guild was the most sensitive to changes in coffe management, being very reduced in sun plantations, while abundant ants and ants on coffee bushes were not affected in the same way. The presence of the cryptic guild was positively affected by vegetation cover and negatively by soil temperature. We concluded that an environmentally friendly agricultural management, like organic coffee with diverse shade, is a matrix that favors the diversity of ants from forest patches in the rural coffee landscape.

How to Cite
RIVERA, L., & ARMBRECHT, I. (2005). Diversity of three ant guilds in shade and sun coffee plantations and forests of Risaralda. Revista Colombiana De Entomología, 31(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v31i1.9422
References

AGOSTI, D.; MAJER, J. D.; ALONSO, L. E.; SCHULTS, T. R. 2000. Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity: Preface. Smithsonian Institution. Washington, D. C.

ANDERSEN, A. 1997. Using ants bioindicators: Multiscale issues in ant community ecology. Conservation Ecology 1 (1): 8.

ANDERSEN, A. N. 2000. Global Ecology of rain forest ants, functional groups in relation to environmental stress and disturbance. p. 25-34. En: D. Agosti, J. D. Majer, l. E. Alonso, & T. R. Shults (eds.). Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity: Smithsonian Institution. Washington, D. C.

ARMBRECHT, I.; PERFECTO I. 2003. Litter-twig dwelling ant species richness and predation potential within a forest fragment and neighboring coffee plantations of contrasting habitat quality in Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 97: 107-115.

BEER, J. 1987. Advantages, disadvantages and desirable characteristics of shade tres for coffee, cocoa and tea. Agroforestry Systems 5: 3-13.

BEER, J.; MUSCHELER, R.; KASS, D.; SOMARRIBA, E. 1998. Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agroforestry Systems 38: 139-164.

BOLETÍN DE LA SOCIEDAD AGROPECUARIA TATAMÁ. 2002. E.mail: cafeapia@pereira. multi.net.co

BOLTON, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the word. Harvard University press. Cambridge, Massachusetts. 222 p.

COLWELL, R. K. 1997. User.s guide to EstimateS 6. Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.

COLWELL, R. K.; CODDINGTON, J. A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (serie B). 345: 101.

DELABIE, J. H.; AGOSTI, D.; DO NASCIMENTO, I. C. 2000. Litter ant communities of Brazilian Atlantic rain forest region. Chapter 1. p. 1-17. En: D. Agosti, J. D. Majer, L. Alonso & T. Schultz (eds.). Sampling Ground-dwelling ants: case studies from the world.s rain forests. Curtin University School of Environmental Biology Bulletin. No. 18. Perth, Australia.

GOTELLI, N. J.; COLWELL, R. K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters. 4: 379-391.

HOLLDOBLER, B.; WILSON, E. O. 1990. The ants. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachussets. 732 p.

IBARRA-NÚÑEZ, G. 1990. Los artrópodos asociados a cafetos en un cafetal mixto del Soconusco, Chiapas, México. Folia entomológica Mexicana 79: 207-231.

LUDWING, J. A.; REYNOLDS, J. 1988. Statistical ecology: a primer methods and computing. Wiley, New York.

MAJER, J. D. 1993. Comparison of the arboreal ant mosaic in Ghana, Brazil, Papua New Guinea and Australia its structure and influence on arthropod diversity. p. 115141. En: J. LaSalle & I. D. Gauld (eds.). Hymenoptera and Biodiversity, CAB international. Wallingford, United Kingdom.

MOGUEL, P.; TOLEDO, V. M. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional systems of Mexico. Conservation Biology 13: 11-21.

NESTEL, D.; DICKSCHEN, F.; ALTIERI, M. A. 1993. Diversity patterns of soil macro-Coleoptera in Mexican shaded and unshaded coffee agroecosystems: an indication of habitat perturbation. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 70-78.

OSBORN, F.; GOITIA, W.; CABRERA, M.; JAFFÉ, K. 1998. Ants, plants and butterflies as diversity indicators: Comparison between strata at six forest sites in Venezuela. Fauna and Environment 1: 59-64.

PAOLETTI, M. G.; PIMENTEL, D.; STINNER, B. R.; STINNER, D. 1992. Agroecosystem biodiversity: matching production and conservation biology. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 40: 3-23.

PERFECTO, I.; VANDERMEER, J. 1994. Understanding biodiversity loss in agroecosystems: Reduction of ant diversity resulting from transformation of the coffee ecosystem in Costa Rica. Entomological trends in agricultural science. 2: 7-13.

PERFECTO, I.; ARMBRECHT, I. 2003. Tecnological change and biodiversity in the coffee agroecosystem of Nothern Latin America (Chapter 6). p. 159-194. En: J. Vandermeer (ed.). Tropical agroecosystems CRC Press LLC. Boca Ratón, Florida.

PERFECTO, I.; RICE, R. A.; GREENBERG, R.; VAN DER VOORT, M. E. 1996. Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46: 598-608.

PERFECTO, I.; VANDERMEER, J.; HANSON, P.; CARTIN, V. 1997. Arthropod biodiversity loss and the transformation of a tropical agro-ecosystem. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 935-945.

RAMOS-SUÁREZ, M. P.; MORALES, H.; RUIZMONTOYA, L.; SOTO-PINTO, L.; ROJAS FERNÁNDEZ, P. 2002. ¿Se mantiene la diversidad de hormigas con el cambio de bosque mesófilo a cafetales?. p. 16-30. En: A. Monro & M. C. Peña (eds.). Actas del Simposio café y Biodiversidad. Revista Protección Vegetal, Año 12 (2) ISBN 056501816. Edición Especial. San Salvador.

RICE, A.; DRENNING, J. 2003. Manual de café bajo sombra. Smithsonian Migratory Bird center (bird friendly). National Zoological Park, Washington, D.C. www.si.edu/smbc. 62 p.

SWIFT, M.; VANDERMEER, J.; RAMAKRISHNAN, P. S.; ANDERSON, C.; ONG, K.; HAWKINS, B. A. 1996. Biodiversity and agroecosystem function. p 261-298. En: H.A. Mooney, J. H. Cushman, E. Medina, O. E. Sala & E. D. Schulze (eds.). Functional Roles of Biodiversity: a global perspective. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Authors retain the copyright on their work and are responsible for the ideas expressed in them. Once a manuscript is approved for publication, authors are asked for a publication license for the term of legal protection, for all territories that allows the use, dissemination and disclosure of the same.