The hymenopterans associated with an agroforestry plot of Borojoa petinoi, Cedrela odorata, Apeiba aspera and Inga spectabilis at the farm of the University of Chocó, municipality of Lloró, Chocó

https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v30i2.9561
Diversity Entomophages Phytophages Vegetative components Frequency

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español)

Published: Dec 31, 2004
Issue: Vol. 30 No. 2 (2004)
Section Agriculture / Research paper

Publcation metrics

17




 


Main Article Content

Authors

JHON CÉSAR NEITA-M. Universidad Tecnológica del Chocó
HERNÁN CORTÉS-V. Universidad Tecnológica del Chocó
ALEJANDRO MADRIGAL-C.J Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín
Abstract

This research was conducted on the farm of the "Universidad Technological del Chocó", municipality of Lloro, 90 elev. and 24ºC. Surveys were conducted over twelve months by periodically sampling each of the plant species selected; insects were directly captured from plant structures. The diversity of hymenopterans between forest and agricultural components was compared; in addition, the trophic groups for hymenopterans from each parcel were established. Forty species were identified, distributed in 8 families, with 57,5% of the species belonging to the family Formicidae; followed by Apidae with 17,5%, lchneumonidae with 10% and Vespidae with 5%; the remaining 10% belonged to Argidae, Braconidae, Mymaridae and Pompilidae. Borojoa patino had the highest diversity of Hymenoptera and Apeiba aspera the lowest. About 44,4% of the insect species were common to all four plant components. Among the phytophagous insects, nectar and pollen feeders were the most representative with 17,5% each. Among the entomophagous lnsects. predators predominated with 32,5%. The abundance of the insects was associated with the phenology of the plant species in the parcel. B. petinoi, Cedrella odorata and Inga spectabilis shared the same periods of regrowth and flowering between April and May, when the abundance of Hymenoptera and their natural enemies was highest. The most abundant species were E:ulaena meriana, Lestrimelitta limao (first reports for Chocó) and Sericomyrmex sp. (first report of the genus for Chocó). One economically important species, Atta cephalotes, was identified because of its damage to B. patinoi fruits.

How to Cite
NEITA-M., J. C., CORTÉS-V., H., & MADRIGAL-C.J, A. (2004). The hymenopterans associated with an agroforestry plot of Borojoa petinoi, Cedrela odorata, Apeiba aspera and Inga spectabilis at the farm of the University of Chocó, municipality of Lloró, Chocó. Revista Colombiana De Entomología, 30(2), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v30i2.9561
References

ALDANA, R. C.; CHACÓN, P. 1999. Megadiversidad de Hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de la cuenca media del río Calima. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 25: 37-47.

BORROR, D.; DE LONG, D; TRIPLEHORN, C. 1981.A introduction to the study of insects. USA: Philadelphia, CBSCollege Publishing. 827 p.

ESPINAL, S. 1977. Zonas de vida y formaciones vegetales de Colombia. Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi, lGAC, Vol. XIII No. Il. Bogotá. 337 p.

FERNÁNDEZ, F. 1991. Las hormigas cazadoras del género Ectatomma (Formicidae: Ponerinae) en Colombia. Caldasia 16: 551-564.

FERNÁNDEZ., F. 1993. Hormigas de Colombia III.Los géneros Acanthoponera Mayr, Heteroponera Mayry Paraponera Fr. Smith (Formicidae: Ponerinae: Ectatomini). Caldasia 17: 249-258.

FERNÁNDEZ, F. 1995. La diversidad de los himenópteros en Colombia. p. 373-424. En J. O. Rangel (ed.) Colombia Diversidad Biótica I. Universidad Nacional de Colombia &. INDERENA, Santafé de Bogotá D. C.

FERNÁNDEZ, F.2000. Sistemática de los Himenópteros de Colombia: Estado de Conocimiento y Perspectlvas. p. 233-243.En: PriBES. Proyecto Iberoamericano de Biogeografía y Entomología Sistemática.Vol. l. Martín-Piera, F.; Morrone J. J.; MelicA. (eds.), CYTED Para el Inventario y Estimación de la Diversidad Entomológica en Íbero América.

FERNÁNDEZ, F. 2002. Revisión de las Hormigas Camponotus subgénero Dendromyrmex (tlymenoptera: Formicidae) Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia 42 (4): 47-101.

GASTON, K. J. 1991. The magnitude of Global Insect Richness. Conservation Biology 5 (3):283-296.

GASTON, K. J.; GAULD, I.D; HANSON, P.1996. The slze and composition of the hymenopteran fauna of Costa Rica. Journal of Biogeography 23: 105-113.

GAULD, I; HANSON, P. E. 1995a. The order Hymenoptera. p. 4-6. En: Hanson, P.E.y Gauld, l. (eds.). The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica.The Natural History Museum, London.

GAULD, R.: HANSON, P.E. 1995b. The evolution, classification and identification of the Hymenoptera. p. 138-156. En: Hanson, P.E. y Gauld, i. (eds.). The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica. The Natural History Museum, London.

GAULD, I.: HANSON, P. E. 1995c. Important biological features in the evolution of the order. p. 28-32. En Hanson, P.EYGauld, 1. (eds.) The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica.The Natural History Museum. London.

GAULD, R.: HANSON, P.E. 1995d. Introduction to the chrysidoid families. p. 464-465. En: Hanson, P. E. Y Gauld, i. (eds.). The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica. The Natural History Museum, London.

GOULET, H; HUBER, J.T. 1993. Hymenoptera of the world: An identification guide to families. Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research Ottawa, Ontario. 668 p.

HANS, C. A. 1988. Evaluación Preliminar del Crecimiento de 20 Especies Maderables en la Región de Lloró-Carretera Panamericana, Chocó, Colombia. Serie Técnica No. 29. Corporación Nacional de Investigación y Fomento Forestal. Bogotá. 31 p.

HANSON, P.E.; GAULD, I.D (eds.), 1995. The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica. Oxford University Press. 893 p.

HOLLDOBLER, B.; WILSON,E.O. 1990.Theants. Harvard University, Cambridge. 732 p.

LASALLE, J.; GAULD, I. D. (eds.). 1993. Hymenoptera and Biodiversity. C.A.B. International, UK. 348 p.

LUDWING, J. A.; REYNOLDS, J. F. 1988. Statistical Ecology. John Wiley and Sons. NewYork. 337 p.

MACKAY, W.P. 1993. A review of the newworld ants of the genus Dolichoderus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 22 (1): 1-143.

MACKAY, W.; MACKAY, E. 1989. Clave de los géneros de hormigas de México (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Memoria 1.11Simposio de Insectos Sociales. Oaxtepex. Morlos. 142 p.

MACKAY.W.; MACKAY, E. 1986. Las Hormigas de Colombia: Arrieras del género Atta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomología 12 (1): 23-30.

MASNER, L.; DESSART, P. 1967. La réclassification des catégories taxonomiques supérieures des Ceraphronoidea (Hymenoptera). Bulletin Institute Recurs Science Natural Belgica. 43: 1-43.

MONTANINI, F. 1992. Sistemas Agroforestales: Principios y Aplicaciones en el Trópico. 2da. Edic. Organización para Estudios Tropicales. San José. Costa Rica, 622 p.

PALACIO, E. 1999. Hormigas Legionarias (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ecitoninae) de Colombia. p. 117-189. En: Insectos de Colombia Estudios Volumen II: Andrade, G. Amat. G. &:. Fernández, F.(eds.). Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales y Centro Editorial Javeriano. Bogotá. 434 p.

RAMÍREZ, A. 1999. Ecología aplicada "Diseño y Análisis Estadístico. Fundación Universitaria Jorge Tadeo Lozano. Bogotá. 325 p.

RICHARDS, O. W. 1977. Hymenoptera, Introduction and key to families (2nd Editioll). Handbook for the Identification of British Insects. 6 (1): 1-100.

SHARKEY, M. J.; WAHL, D. B. 1992. Cladistics of the Ichneumonoidea (Hymenoptera). Journal Hymenoptera Research 1: 15-24.

SERNA, F. 1999. Diversidad de hormigas del área de influencia del proyecto hidroeléctrico Porce II. Tesis de Maestría en Entomología. Posgrado de Entomología Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Medellín. 248 p.

STEEL, R.; TORRIE, J. 1980. Principies and procedures of statistics a Biometrial Approach. McGraw-Hill Inc. México.622 p.

VÉLEZ, G. A. 1995. Sistemas agroforestales 1. Universidad SurColombiana.Bogotá. 139p.

WAY, M. J.; KHOO, K. C. 1992. Role of ants in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 37: 479-503.

Authors retain the copyright on their work and are responsible for the ideas expressed in them. Once a manuscript is approved for publication, authors are asked for a publication license for the term of legal protection, for all territories that allows the use, dissemination and disclosure of the same.