Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
10.25100/socolen.v49i2.12316
Submitted: 15-07-2022
Published: 11-07-2023

Floral characteristics in five landraces accessions of pumpkin (Cucurbita argyrosperma) related to the attraction of insect visitors

Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal
Tecnológico Nacional de México
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal
Keywords: Plant-insect interactions, flower characteristics, nectar, pollen, floral visitors, pollination

How to Cite

1.
Balam-Pech ML, Ballina-Gómez HS, Medina-Dzul K, Ruiz-Sánchez E, González-Moreno A. Floral characteristics in five landraces accessions of pumpkin (Cucurbita argyrosperma) related to the attraction of insect visitors. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 11 [cited 2026 Oct. 14];49(2). Available from: https://revistacolombianaentomologia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/SOCOLEN/article/view/12316
Metrics

573 | 1629 | 141




 

Download:

Abstract

Pollination is extremely important for agriculture, with insects being the main pollinators. Plants have developed attraction strategies in their flowers to ensure visits from pollinators; therefore, knowing the floral characteristics that influence visits to crops could lead to improvements in yield. The floral attributes of five landraces accessions of pumpkin (Cucurbita argyrosperma) were compared: RRS004, RRS006, RRS005, RRS008 and RRS010. The experiment was carried out in a family orchard in Baca, Yucatan, Mexico. Evaluations were carried out in the period of maximum flowering, the size and area of the corolla, the height of the flower, floral display, volume and concentration of sugar in nectar, pollen production and its viability were recorded; and also, floral visitors. The results showed that there are differences in terms of floral traits between evaluated accessions, as well as the pollen and nectar floral area was associated with floral visitors. Similarly, a greater number of illegitimate visits was observed compared to legitimate visits, of which all were identified as chrysomelids (Acalymma sp.), bees (Partamona sp.), drosophilids (Drosophila sp.), thrips (Frankliniella sp.), ants (Solenopsis sp.) and wasps (Polybia sp.). Our study shows that the variation recorded in floral traits between accessions impacts the attraction of visiting insects, which demonstrates an important intraspecific variation in Cucurbita sp.

571 1770
  1. Akinyemi, A. O., Subramanian, S., Mfuti, D. K., Pope, T., Tamiru, A., & Kirk, W. (2021). Mating behavior, mate choice and female resistance in the bean flower thrips (Megalurothrips sjostedti). Scientific Reports, 11, 14504. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93891-5
  2. Ayala, R. (1999). Revisión de las abejas sin aguijón de México. Folia Entomológica Mexicana, 106, 1-123.
  3. Bailes E. J., Ollerton J., Pattrick J. G., & Glover, B. J. (2015). How can an understanding of plant–pollinator interactions contribute to global food security. Current opinion in plant biology 26, 72-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.06.002
  4. Bailes, E. J., Pattrick, J. G., & Glover, B. J. (2018). An analysis of the energetic reward offered by field bean (Vicia faba) flowers: Nectar, pollen, and operative force. Ecology and Evolution. 8(6), 3161-3171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3851
  5. Barberis, M., Bogo, G., Bortolotti, L., Conte, L., Alesaandrini, M., Nepi, M., & Galloni, M. (2021). Gender-biased nectar targets different behavioural traits of flower visitors. Plant Ecology, 222, 233-246. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4271937
  6. Bauer, A. A., Clayton M. K. M., & Brunet, J. (2017). Floral traits influencing plant attractiveness to three bee species: Consequences for plant reproductive success. American Journal of Botany, 104(5), 772-781. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1600405
  7. Bazo, I., Espejo, R., Palomino, C., Flores, M., Chang, M., López, C., & Mansila, R. (2018). Estudios de biología floral, reproductiva y visitantes florales en el “Loche” de Lambayeque (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne). Ecología Aplicada, 17(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v17i2.1239
  8. Bertazzini, M., & Forlani, G. (2016). Intraespecific variability of floral nectar volume and composition in raped seed (Brassica napus L. var oleifera). Front in Plant Science, 7, 288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00288
  9. Blüthgen, N., & Fiedler, K. (2004). Preferences for sugars and aminoacids and their condicionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73(1), 155-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00789.x
  10. Brothers, D. J., & Finnamore, A. (1993). Superfamily Vespoidea. En H. Goulet, & J. Huber (Eds.). Hymenoptera of the world: An identification guide to families (pp. 161-232). Canada Communication Group. Canada. 688.
  11. Brunet, J. M., Thairu, M. W., Henss, J. M., Link, R. I., & Kluever, J. A. (2015). The effects of flower, floral display, and reward sizes on bumblebee foraging behaviour when pollen is the reward and plants are dichogamous. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 176(9), 811-819. https://doi.org/10.1086/683339
  12. Canul, K, J., Ramirez, V.P., Castillo, G. F. y Chávez, S. J. L. (2005). Diversidad morfológica de Calabaza cultivada en el centro-oriente de Yucatán, México. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 28(4), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2005.4.339
  13. Carr, D., Haber, A. I., Lecroy, K. A., Lee, D. E., & Link, R. (2015). Variation in reward quality and pollinator attraction: the consumer does not always get it right. AoB Plants, 7, plv034. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv034
  14. Conner, J. & Rush, S. (1996). Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecología, 105(4) 509-516. https://doi.org./10.1007/BF00330014
  15. Delgado-Carrillo, O., Lopezaraiza-Mikel, M., Ashworth, L., Aguilar, R., Lobo, J., & Quesada, M. (2017). A scientific note on the first record of nesting sites of Peponapis crassidentata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie, 48(5), 644-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-017-0507-5
  16. Delgado-Carrillo, O., Martén-Rodríguez, S., Ashworth, L., Aguilar, R., Lopezaraiza-Mikel, M., & Quesada, M. (2018). Temporal variation in pollination services to Cucurbita moschata is determined by bee gender and diversity. Ecosphere, 9(11), e02506. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2506
  17. Eben, A. (2012). ¿Porque amargarse la vida? La asociación de los escarabajos Diabroticina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) con plantas de la familia Cucurbitaceae. En J. C. Rojas, & E. A. Malo (Eds.), Temas Selectos en Ecología Química de Insectos (pp. 193-216). El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, México. 446.
  18. Eckhart, V. (1991). The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of phacelia-linearis (Hydrophyllaceae)- Evolutionary Ecology, 5(4), 370-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214154
  19. Enríquez, E., Ayala, R., Gonzalez, V., & Núñez-Farfán, J. (2015). Alpha and beta diversity of bees and their pollination role on Cucurbita pepo L. (Cucurbitaceae) in the Guatemalan cloud forest. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 91(3), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.3956/2015-91.3.211
  20. Ferreira C. A., & Torezan, H. M. (2013). Implications of floral herbivory on Malpighiacea plant fitness: visual aspect of the flower affect attractiveness to pollinators. Sociobiology, 60(3), 323-328. http://periodicos.uefs.br/index.php/sociobiology/article/view/238
  21. Gaffney, A., Bohman, B., Quarrell, S. R., Brown, P. H., & Allen, G. R. (2020). It is not all about being sweet: Differences in floral traits and insect visitation among hybrid carrot cultivars. Insects, 11(7), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11070402
  22. Garzón, T., Montes, H. & Becerra F. (1993). Fuentes de resistencia a los virus Mosaico del Pepino y de la Ssandía-2, en calabaza (Cucurbita moschata) , en México. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, 11, 167-171.
  23. Gélvez, I., Neves, A. N., Teixido, A., & Fernandes, G. W. (2018). Reproductive biology and floral visitors of Collaea cipoensis (Fabaceae), an endemic shrub of the rupestrian grasslands. Flora, 238, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.03.012
  24. Ghosh, S., Jeon, H., & Jung, C. (2020). Foraging behaviour and preference of pollen sources by honey bee (Apis mellifera) relative to protein contents. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 44(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-0149-9
  25. Hernández, B. G. (1978). Cucurbitáceas. In: T Cervantes S (ed). Recursos Genéticos Disponibles a México. SOMEFI. Chapingo. pp 357-367.
  26. Irwin, R., Howell, P., & Galen, C. (2015). Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plants fitness. Journal of Ecology, 103(6), 1487-1497. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12476
  27. Khan, M. S., & Yogi, M. K. (2017). Insect Crop Pollinators. En Omkar (Ed.), Industrial Entomology (pp. 397-412). Springer Singapore. Singapore.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3304-9_14
  28. Klein, A. M., Vaissiere, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I, Cunningham, S., Kremen, C., & Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1608), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
  29. Krysan, J. (1986). Introduction: Biology, distribution and identification of pest Diabrotica. En J. L. Krysan, & T.A. Miller (Eds.), Methods for the study of pest Diabrotica (pp. 1-23). Springer. EE.UU. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4868-2
  30. Lira, R. (1995). Estudios taxonómicos y ecogeográficos de las Cucurbitaceae latinoamericanas de importancia económica. 281p.
  31. Mackay, W., & Mackay, E. (1989). Clave de los géneros de hormigas en México (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). En Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología (Ed.), Memorias del II Simposio Nacional de Insectos Sociales (pp. 1-42). México.
  32. Mallinger, R. E., & Prasifka, J. R. (2017). Bee visitation to cultivated sunflowers increase with the amount and accessibility of néctar sugars. Journal of Applied Entomology, 141(7), 561-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12375
  33. Mcgrady, C. M., Troyer, R., & Fleischer, S. J. (2019). Wild bee visitation rates exceed pollination thresholds in commercial Cucurbita agroecosystems. Journal of Economic Entomology, 113(2), 5562-574. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz295
  34. Mazzei, M., Vesprini, J. & Galetto L. (2020). Visitantes florals no polinizadores en plantas del género Cucurbita y su relación con la presencia de abejas polinizadoras. Acta Agronómica, 69(4), 256-265. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v69n4.87639
  35. Meléndez-Ramírez, V., Magaña-Rueda, S., Parra-Tabla, V., Ayala, R., & Navarro, J. (2002). Diversity of native bee visitors of cucurbit crops (Cucurbitaceae) in Yucatán, México. Journal of Insect Conservation, 6, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023219920798
  36. Michener, C., Mcginley, R. J., & Danforth, B. N. (1994). The bee genera of north and central America (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, EE.UU. 1994. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19941106984
  37. Mitchell, R., Karron J., Holmquist K., Bell M. (2004). The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecology, 18(1). 116-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00812.x
  38. Montes-Hernández, S., Merrick, L., & Eguiarte, L. (2005). Maintenance of squash (Cucurbita spp.) landrace diversity by farmers activities in México. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52, 697-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-6018-4
  39. Newman, E., & Jhonson, S. (2021). A shift in long-proposcid fly pollinators and floral tube length among populations of Erica junonia (Ericacea). South African Journal of Botany, 142, 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.07.014
  40. Organizacion de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura [FAO]. (2022). El Sistema mundial de información y alerta rápida sobre los recursos fitogenéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura. Glosario. fao.org/views/glossary/es/
  41. Piedade, K., Araujo, L. E., Medeiros, K. M., Ribeiro, M. F., & Sarmento, E. M. (2016). Evaluation of floral characteristics of melon hybrids (Cucumis melo L.) in pollinator attractiveness. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 38(2), e531. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452016531
  42. Rering, C. C., Beck, J. J., Hall, G. W., Mccartney, M. M., & Vannette, R. L. (2018). Nectar-inhabiting microorganisms influence nectar volatile composition and attractiveness to a generalist pollinator. New Phytologist, 220(3), 750-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14809
  43. Rodríguez, A., Montes, S., Rangel, J. A., Mendoza, M., & Latournerie, L. (2009). Caracterización morfológica de la calabaza pipiana (Cucurbita argyrosperma Huber). Agricultura Técnica en México, 35(4), 378-388. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/agritm/v35n4/v35n4a3.pdf
  44. Rowe, L., Gibson, D., Bahlai, C., Gibbs, J., Landis, D., & Isaacs, R. (2020). Flower traits associated with the visitation pattern of bees. Oecologia, 193, 511-522. https://doi.org/10.10007/s00442-020-04674-0
  45. Ricou, C., Schneller, C., Amiaud, B., Plantureux, S., & Bockstaller, C. (2014). A vegetation-based indicator to assess the pollination value of field margin flora. Ecological Indicators, 45, 320-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.022
  46. Saini, P., Saini, P., Kaur, J. J.,Francies, R. M., Gani, M., Rajendra, A. A., Negi, N., Jagtap, A., Kadam, A., Singh, Ch., & Chauhan, S. S. (2020). Molecular Approaches for Harvesting Natural Diversity for Crop Improvement. En R. K. Salgotra, & S. M. Zargar (Eds.), Rediscovery of Genetic and Genomic Resources for Future Food Security (pp. 67-169). Springer Singapore, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0156-2_3
  47. Shivanna, K., & Tandon, R. (2014). Pollination Ecology. En K. R. Shivanna, & R. Tandon (Eds.), Reproductive Ecology of Flowering Plants: A Manual (pp. 63-96). Springer New Delhi, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2003-9_7
  48. Simpson, B. B., & Neff, J. L. (1983). Evolution and diversity of floral rewards. En C.E. Jones, & R.J. Little (Eds.), Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Scientific and Academic Editions (pp. 142-159). New York, EE. UU.
  49. Soto, G. A., & Retana, A. (2003). Clave ilustrada para los géneros de Thysanoptera y especies de Frankliniella presentes en cuatro zonas hortícolas en Alajuela, Costa Rica. Agronomía Costarricense, 27(2), 55-68. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=43627205
  50. Stanghellini, M. S., Schultheis J. R., & Ambrosio, J. T. (2002). Pollen mobilization in selected Cucurbitaceae and the putative effects of pollinator abundance on pollen depletion rates. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 127(5), 729-736. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.5.729
  51. Unni, A. P., Mir, S. H., Rajesh, T. P., Ballullaya, U. P., Thomas, J., & Sinu, P. A. (2021). Native and invasive ants affect floral visits of pollinating honey bees in pumpkin flowers (Cucurbita maxima). Nature. Scientific Reports, 11, 4781. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83902-w
  52. Vaudo, A. D., Tooker, J. F., Patch, H. M., Biddinger, D. J., Coccia, M., Crone, M. K., Fiely, M., Francis, J. S., Hines, H. M., Hodges, M., Jackson, S. W., Michez, D., MU, J., Russo, L., Safari, M., Treanore, E. D., Vanderplanck, M., Yip, E., Leonard, A. S., & Grozinger, C. M. (2020). Pollen protein: Lipid macronutrient ratios may guide broad patterns of bee species floral preference. Insects, 11(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11020132
  53. Vijayakumar, R., Behera, T. K., Munshi, A. D., Durgesh, K., Jat, G. S., Boopala Krishnan, G., & Sharma, N. (2018). Pollen viability and in vitro pollen germination studies in Momordica species and their intra and interspecific hybrids. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(6), 32-40. https://www.chemijournal.com/archives/2018/vol6issue6/PartA/6-4-513-379.pdf
  54. Villanueva, C., (2007). Calabazas cultivadas. Identificación de especies, caracterización y Descripción varietal. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.
  55. Whitaker, T.W. & Davis, G.N. (1962). Cucurbits, botany, cultivation and utilization. Interscience Publishers, Inc. 250
  56. Whitaker, T. W. (1968). Cucurbita. In: Handbook of Genetics. R c King (ed). Plenum Press. 135-144 pp.
  57. Whitney, H. M., & Glover, B. J. (2007). Morphology and development of floral features recognised by pollinators. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 1, 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9014-3
Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

1.
Balam-Pech ML, Ballina-Gómez HS, Medina-Dzul K, Ruiz-Sánchez E, González-Moreno A. Floral characteristics in five landraces accessions of pumpkin (Cucurbita argyrosperma) related to the attraction of insect visitors. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 11 [cited 2026 Oct. 14];49(2). Available from: https://revistacolombianaentomologia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/SOCOLEN/article/view/12316
Citations
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Luisa Balam-Pech, Horacio Salomón Ballina-Gómez, Kati Medina-Dzul, Esau Ruiz-Sánchez, Alejandra González-Moreno