Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
10.25100/socolen.v48i2.12018
Published: 07-07-2022

A new symphysomely case for Cryptops Leach, 1815 (Scolopendromorpha: Cryptopidae) in Chile

Universidad de Concepción
Universidad de Concepción
Universidad del Bio Bio
Keywords: Chlie, Chilopoda, myriapods, teratology

How to Cite

1.
Vega Román E, Marchant M, Sánchez I. A new symphysomely case for Cryptops Leach, 1815 (Scolopendromorpha: Cryptopidae) in Chile. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 7 [cited 2026 Oct. 16];48(2). Available from: https://revistacolombianaentomologia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/SOCOLEN/article/view/12018
Metrics

296 | 299 | 22




 

Abstract

The first case of symphysomely on the antennae of Cryptops Leach, 1815 (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Cryptopidae) from the Concepción (Chile) is reported. The right antenna of the specimen has a lower number of antennomeres, which are also larger than the ones from the left antenna. We discuss the possible factors affecting the appearance of this occurrence. 

296 322
  1. BALAZUC, J.; SCHUBART, O. 1962. La teratologie des myriapodes. Année Biologique 1 (3-4): 145-174.
  2. BONATO, L.; EDGECOMBE, G. E.; LEWIS, A.; PEREIRA, R.; SHELLEY, R., ZAPPAROLI, M. 2010. A common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda). ZooKeys 69: 17-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.69.737
  3. BRÖLEMANN H. W. 1894. Difformité constatée chez un Himantarium gabrielis L. Feuille des Jeunes Naturalistes 3 (24): 124-125.
  4. BRÖLEMANN H., W. 1904. Chilopodes monégasques. Bulletin du Musée Oceánographique de Monaco 15: 1-15.
  5. CABANILLAS, D. 2021. High richness and unusual composition of centipedes (Myriapoda, Chilopoda) in an urban renaturalised area of central Iberian Peninsula. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Entomología 45 (3-4): 277-291. http://www.entomologica.es/publicaciones-boletin/art1901
  6. DUFFAUT, M. 1908. Description de quelques difformités observés chez des articulés. Sociéte d’Histoire Naturelle et des Sciences Biologiques et Énergétiques de Toulouse 41: 54-56.
  7. FRÜND H. C. 1992. The occurrence and frequency of scars in centipedes. Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlich - Medizinischen Vereins in Innsbruck, Supplement 10: 269-275.
  8. GARCÍA-RUIZ, A. 1995. On some cases of structural abnormality in Scolopendra (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). Bulletin of the British Myriapod group 11: 33-35. https://www.bmig.org.uk/sites/www.bmig.org.uk/files/bulletin_bmg/BullBMG11p33-35_Garcia-Ruiz_Abnormality-Scolopendra.pdf
  9. GARCÍA-RUIZ, A. 2003. Ecología de las comunidades de quilópodos en áreas modificadas por depósito de residuos sólidos urbanos inertes. Ecología 17: 191-197. https://www.mapa.gob.es/ministerio/pags/Biblioteca/Revistas/pdf_REPN%2FECO_2003_17_191_197.pdf
  10. HUTTON F. W. 1878. Notes on the New Zealand Myriapoda in the Otago Museum Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 10: 288-293. https://archive.org/details/biostor-105256
  11. LEŚNIEWSKA, M. 2004. Bifurcation of antenna in Stigmatogaster subterraneos (Shaw, 1794) (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Biological Letters 41 (1): 51-53.
  12. LEŚNIEWSKA, M., BONATO, L., MINELLI, A.; FUSCO, G. 2009. Trunk anomalies in the centipede Stigmatogaster subterranea provide insight into late-embryonic segmentation. Arthropod Structure and Development 38 (5): 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2009.05.001
  13. LEWIS, J. G. E. (1968). Individual variations in a population of the centipede Scolopendra amazonica from Nigeria and its implications for methods of taxonomic discrimination in Scolopendridae. Journal of the Linnean Society London, Zoology 47 (312): 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1968.tb00515.x
  14. LEWIS, J. 2011. A review of the species in the Genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the old world related to Cryptops (Cryptops) hortensis (Donovan, 1810) (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). International Journal of Morphology 4: 11-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1116
  15. LEWIS, J. 2013. A review of the species in the genus Cryptops Leach, 1815 from the old World and the Australian region related to Cryptops (Cryptops) doriae Pocock, 1891 (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Cryptopidae). Zootaxa 3683 (1): 001-034. https://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3683.1.1
  16. MARUZZO, D., BONATO, L., BRENA, C., FUSCO, G.; A. MINELLI. 2005. Appendage loss and regeneration in arthropods: a comparative view, In: Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships (Eds. S. Koenemann and R. A. Jenner), 215-245. Crustacean Issues 16, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton. https://www.biologia.unipd.it/giuseppe.fusco/PDFs/2005%20Maruzzo%20et%20al%20CrustIss.pdf
  17. MINELLI, A.; PASQUAL, C. 1986. On some abnormal specimens of centipedes. Lavori. Societá Veneziana di Scienze Naturali 11: 135-141.
  18. MINELLI, A. (2003). The development of animal form. Ontogeny, morphology, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-323. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541476
  19. MINELLI, A., FODDAI, D., PEREIRA, L. A., LEWIS, J. G. E. 2000. The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 38 (2): 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0469.2000.382137.x
  20. MITIĆ, B.; MAKAROV, E. 2007. On some morphological anomalies in Eupolybothrus transsylvanicus (Latzel, 1882) (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha). Archives of Biological Sciences 59 (1): 3-4. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS0701001M
  21. MITIĆ, B. M., TOMIĆ, V., MAKAROV, E., ILIĆ, B. S. & ĆURČIĆ, M. P. 2010. On the appendage regeneration of Eupolybothrus transsylvanicus (Latzel) (Chilopoda: lithobiidae). Archives of Biological Sciences 62 (2): 281-287. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS1002281M
  22. MITIĆ B.; MAKAROV, S. E.; ILIĆ, B. S.; STOJANOVIĆ, D. Z.; ĆURČIĆ, P. M. 2011. Cases of trunk segmental anomalies in the Geophilomorpha centipedes Clinopodes flavidus C. L. Koch and Clinopodes trebevicensis (Verhoeff) (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Archives of Biological Sciences 63 (3): 841-845 https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS1103841M
  23. MUNDEL, P. 1990. Chilopoda. pp. 819-832. In: Dindal, D. L. (Eds.), Soil biology guide. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1450 p.
  24. SELBIE C. M. 1913. A new variety of Polydesmus coriaceus, Porat, and note on a centipede monstrosity. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 8 (12): 439-443.
  25. STOJANOVIĆ, D., MITIĆ, B.; MAKAROV, S. L. 2019. Bifurcation of an ultimate leg in Cryptops parisi Brolemann, 1920 (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Cryptopidae). Arthropoda Selecta 28 (1): 21-25. https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.28.1.03
  26. TAKESITA, M. 1918. A centipede with an abnormal antenna. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 9 (4): 389-391. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/view/download/digidepo_10853100_po_ART0003842639.pdf?contentNo=1&alternativeNo=
  27. TUF, H. I.; DÁNYI, L. 2017. A case of abnormality in presence of coxal pores in Lithobiomorpha (Chilopoda). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 69 (4): 597:599. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20183113565
  28. VEGA-ROMÁN, E.; RUIZ, V. 2015. Tres casos teratológicos en miriápodos chilenos. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 41 (1): 153-155.
Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

1.
Vega Román E, Marchant M, Sánchez I. A new symphysomely case for Cryptops Leach, 1815 (Scolopendromorpha: Cryptopidae) in Chile. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 7 [cited 2026 Oct. 16];48(2). Available from: https://revistacolombianaentomologia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/SOCOLEN/article/view/12018
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Emmanuel Abraham Vega, Margarita Marchant, Iván Sánchez