Main Article Content

Authors

Richness of the tribe Eumaeini was analyzed on a temporal scale on San Antonio hill, west of Cali, based on collections made in 2003. Specimens were collected with 5 m and 1.8 m long insect nets in 92 surveys. Species accumulation curves and similarity analysis (Jaccard) were carried out to compare 11 months of the year with BiodiversityPro software and rarefaction curves made with Ecosim700. The richness of Eumaeini recorded on the hill reached 72 species distributed in 32 genera. Estimators indicated that about 88% of the species that fly in the zone were collected. At least 20 species were distributed across the entire year, have constant populations in San Antonio, and use the hill as a site for mate finding. At least 26 species were assumed to not display hilltopping behaviour or their populations were relatively low in the area around the hill.  The months of July and August showed a high number of species although the rarefaction analysis indicated that there was no significant differences in richness among the 11 months in 2003. The similarity between the months was less than 56% according to the Jaccard similarity analysis. The changes in community richness were principally due to the rain regime and to the greater or lesser influence of sun in the zone.  The great number of unique species could be due to individuals that do not display hilltopping behaviour or to those that come from distant sites that have large and stable populations.

PRIETO, C., & DAHNERS, H. W. (2006). Eumaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from San Antonio hill: Dynamics of species richness and hilltopping behaviour. Revista Colombiana De Entomología, 32(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v32i2.9388

ACKERY, P. R. 1975. A new Pierine genus and species with notes on the genus Tatochila (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 30: 1-9.

ALCOCK, J. 1987. Leks and hilltopping in insects. Journal of Natural History 21: 319-328.

BÁLINT, Zs.; CONSTANTINO, L. M.; JOHNSON, K. 2003. Atlides dahnersi sp. n. from Colombia, (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Folia Entomologica Hungarica 64: 251-266.

BAUGHMAN, J. F.; MURPHY, D. D. 1988. What constitutes a hill to a hilltopping butterfly? American Midland Naturalist 120: 441-443.

BECCALONI, G. W., SCOBLE, M. J., ROBINSON, G. S.; PITKIN, B. (eds.). 2003. The Global Lepidoptera Names Index (LepIndex). World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/entomology/lepindex Fecha última revisión: 12 Octubre 2004. Fecha último acceso: 16 Noviembre 2004.

CALLAGHAN, C. J. 1983. A study of isolation mechanism among neotropical butterflies of the subfamily Riodininae. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera. 21 (3): 159-176.

COLWELL, R.; CODDINGTON, J. A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 345: 101118.

D’ABRERA, B. 1995. Butterflies of the neotropical Region. Part VII. Lycaenidae. Victoria, Black Rock, Hill House. 10981270 p.

DRAUDT, M. 1919-20. I. Gruppe: Theclini, p. 744-812. En: Seitz, A. (ed.), Die GrossSchmetterlinge der Erde. Stuttgart, Alfred Kernen 5: 1140 p.

DEMPSTER, J. P. 1983. The natural control of populations of butterflies and moths. Biological Reviews 58: 461-481.

DEVRIES P. J.; WALLA T. R.; GREENEY H. F. 1999. Species diversity in spatial and temporal dimensions of fruit-feeding butterflies from two Ecuadorian rainforests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 333-353.

ELIOT, J. N. 1973. The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tentative arrangement. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Entomology) 28 (6): 373-506.

GASTON, K. J. 1996.Biodiversity. Oxford: Blackwell Science. 396 p.

GILBERT, L. E.; SINGER M. C. 1975. Butterfly ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 6: 365-397.

GILBERT, L. E. 1984. The biology of butterfly communities p. 26-40. En: VaneWright, R. I.; Ackery, P. R. The biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London. 429 p.

GOTELLI, N. J.; ENTSMINGER, G. L. 2001. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. http://homepages.together.net/ ~gentsmin/ecosim.htm. Fecha último acceso: 15 abril 2005.

HEYWOOD, V. H. 1995. Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1140 p.

HOLDRIDGE, L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center. San Jose, Costa Rica. 215 p.

JOHNSON, K. 1992. Genera and species of the neotropical “Elfin” like Hairstreak Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae, Theclinae) Reports of the Museum of Natural History, University of Winsconsin 22 1-135, 22 (2): 136-279.

JHONSON, K.; KRUSE, J. J.; KROENLEIN, K. R. 1997. The Macusiina, a new infratribe of the Eumaeini with description of ten new genera (Lycaenidae). Revista de Theclinae Colombianos 2 (13): 1-30.

JHONSON, K.; SALAZAR, J. A.; VELEZ, J. H. 1997. New species of Micandra Staudinger from Colombia whit distinction of Trochusinus, a new genus of the Eumaeini. Revista de Theclinae Colombianos 2 (15): 1-15.

KATTAN, G.; RESTREPO, C.; GIRALDO, M. 1984. Estructura de un bosque de niebla en la cordillera occidental, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Cespedesia 13: 23-43.

KATTAN, G.; ALVARES, H.; GIRALDO, M. 1994. Forest fragmentation and bird extinctions: San Antonio eighty years later. Conservation Biology 8 (1): 138-146.

KINGSOLVER, J. G. 1985. Butterfly thermoregulation: organismic mechanisms and population consequences. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 24 (1): 1-20.

OREJUELA, J. E. 1985. Tropical forest birds of Colombia: A survey of problems and a plan for their conservation p. 95-115. En: Diamond, A. W.; Lovejoy, T. E. (eds.). Conservation of tropical forest birds. I.C.B.P. Technical Publications No. 4. Cambridge. 318 p.

PE’ER, G.; SALTZ, D.; THULKE, H. H.; MOTRO, U. 2004. Response to topography in a hilltopping butterfly and implications for modelling nonrandom dispersal. Animal Behaviour 68: 825-839.

PRIETO, C. 2003. Satirinos (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) del Parque Nacional Natural Munchique. Diversidad de especies y distribución altitudinal. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 29 (2): 203210.

PRIETO, C. 2006. Diversidad y segregación de nicho en comunidades de Eumaeini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Theclinae) del Valle del Cauca. Colombia. Trabajo para obtener el Diploma de Estudios Avanzados, Universidad de Alicante. España. 70 p.

PRIETO, C.; DAHNERS, H. W. (en preparación) Resource utilization, environmental and spatio-temporal overlap of a hilltopping Lycaenid community. A Null model analysis.

ROBBINS, R. K. 2004. Checklist of Eumaeini. 98. Lycaenidae Theclinae, Eumaeini. 118137pp. Checklist of neotropical lepidoptera. Part 4A. HesperoideaPapilionoidea. Gerardo Lamas (editor). In Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. John B. Heppner. (Serie Ed.). Scientific Publishers, Gainesville. 439 p.

SALAZAR, J. A. 1996. Sobre la concentración de lepidópteros ropalóceros en la cumbre de un cerro del noroccidente de Caldas, Colombia. SHILAP 24 (94): 183-195.

SALAZAR, J. A.; JOHNSON, K. 1997. A new genus of Neotropical hairstreaks utilizing bird excrement as their protective color substrate (Eumaeni: Macusiina). Revista de Theclinae Colombianos 2 (14): 1-10.

SALAZAR, J. A.; JOHNSON, K.; CONSTANTINO, L. M. 1997. Additional new species and records of “elfin”like Eumaeini from Colombia (Lycaenidae). Revista de Theclinae Colombianos 2 (17): 1-13.

SCHLUTER, D.; RICKLEFS, R.E. 1993. Convergence and the regional component of species diversity p. 230–240. In: Species diversity: historical and geographical perspectives (ed. by R.E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

SHAPIRO, A. M.; TORRES, R. 1978. Notas sobre la biología de dos mariposas Pieridae de grandes aturas de Colombia (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Cespedesia 7 (2526): 7-23.

SHIELDS, O. 1967. Hilltopping. An ecological study of summit congregation behavior of butterflies on a southern California hill. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 6: 69-178.

SINGER, M. C.; THOMAS, C. D.; PARMESAN C.; BILLINGTON, H. L. 1989. Variation among conspecific insect populations in the mechanistic basis of diet breadth. Animal Behaviour. 37: 751759.

SINGER, M. C.; THOMAS, D. 1992. The difficulty of deducing behavior from resource use: an example from hilltopping in checkerspot butterflies. American Naturalist 140 (4): 654-664.

VANE-WRIGHT, R. I.; HUMPHRIES, C. J.; WILLIAMS, P. H. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55: 235-254.

WARD, J. H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 236.