Main Article Content

Authors

Myrmeleon brasiliensis larvae are predators that use the sit-and-wait tactic to catch their prey, and to fulfill this pit-making funnel traps in the sandy soil and remain buried waiting for prey to slip. The objective of this study was to observe the predation behavior of larvae of M. brasiliensis in the three larval instars, for this leaf cut ant were collected manually and offered within the plastic pots as prey for 14 larvae of 1st instar larvae, 33 of 2nd and 3rd instar. It was counted the number of attacks of the predator to prey, the number of escapes from jail and the success of prey capture for each larva of M. brasiliensis. The larvae of M. brasiliensis 1st instar attacked more times its prey, followed by larvae of 2nd and 3rd instar. On the number of escape of prey, there was no significant difference in this behavior among larvae. Regarding the success in capturing prey, the larvae of 3rd instar were more successful, with a predation rate of 96.96%, followed by the larvae of 2nd (69.70%) and 1st instar (14.28 %).

MODESTO NONATO, L., & DO NASCIMENTO LIMA, T. (2011). Predation behavior of the Myrmeleon brasiliensis (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) larval instars. Revista Colombiana De Entomología, 37(2), 354–356. https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v37i2.9101

ALLEN, G.; CROFT D. B. 1985. Soil particle size and the pit morphology of the Australian ant-lions Myrmeleon diminutus and M. pictifrons (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 33: 863-874.

BEKOFF, M. 1983. Predatory strategies and behavioral diversity. American Biology Teacher 45: 334-342.

COHEN, A. C. 1998. Solid-to-liquid feeding: the inside(s) story of extraoral digestion in predaceous Arthropoda. American Entomological 44: 103-115.

CROWLEY, P. H.; LINTON, M. C. 1999. Antlion foraging: tracking prey across space and time. Ecology 80: 2271-2282.

COELHO, R. R.; DE ARAUJO JÚNIOR, J. M.; TORRES, J. B. 2008. Comportamento de predação de Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas, 1851) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) em função da disponibilidade de alimento. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, São Paulo 75 (4): 463-470.

DAY, M. D.; ZALUCKI, M. P. 2000. Effect of density on spatial distribution, pit formation and pit diameter of Myrmeleon acer Walker (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae): patterns and processes. Australian Journal of Ecology 25: 58-64.

DALL, S. R. X.; GIRALDEAU, L. A.; OLSSON, O.; MCNAMARA, J. M.; STEPHENS, D. W. 2005. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 187-193.

DEVETAK, D. 2005. Effects of larval antlions Euroleon nostras (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae) and their pits on the escape-time of ants. Physiology Entomology 30: 82-86.

DEVETAK, D. 1998. Detection of substrate vibration in Neuropteriodea: a review. Acta Zoologica Fennica 209: 87-94.

DEVETAK, D.; PERNJAK, A.; EKOVIC, F. 2005. Substrate particle size affects pit building decision and pit size in the antlion larvae Euroleon nostras (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Physiologycal Entomology 30: 158-163.

DÍAS, S. C.; SANTOS, B. A.; WERNECK, F. P.; LIRA, P. K.; CARRASCOCARBALLIDO, V.; FERNANDES, G. W. 2006. Efficiency of prey subjugation by one species of Myrmeleon larvae (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) in the central Amazônia. Brazilian Journal of Biology 66: 441-442.

ENDLER, J. A. 1991. Interactions between predators and prey. P. 169 196. En: Krebs, J. R.; Davies, N. B (eds.). Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary approach. Volume III. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford Editors. 482 p.

FARIA, M. L.; PRADO, P. I.; BEDÊ, L. C.; FERNANDES, G. W. 1994. Structure and dynamics of a larval population of Myrmeleon uniformis (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Brazilian Journal of Biology 54: 335-344.

GRIFFITHS, D. 1980. The feeding biology of antlion larvae: prey capture, handling and utilization. Journal of Animal Ecology 49: 99-125.

GRIFFITHS, D. 1986. Pit construction by antlion larvae: a cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 39-57.

GUILLETTE, L.M.; HOLLIS, K. L.; MARKARIAN, A. 2009. Learning in a sedentary insect predator: Antlions (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) anticipate a long wait. Behavioural Processes 80: 224-232.

HEINRICH, B.; HEINRICH, M. J. E. 1984. The pit-trapping foraging strategy of the Antlion Myrmeleon immaculatus DeGeer (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 14: 151-160.

IWASA, Y.; HIGASHI, M. 1981. Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. The American Naturalist 117: 710-723.

LOMÁSCOLO, S.; FARJI-BRENER, A. G. 2001. Adaptive short-term changes in pit design by antlion larvae (Myrmeleon sp.) in response to different prey condition. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 13: 393-397.

LIMA, T. N.; FARIA, R. R. 2007. Seleção de microhabitat por larvas de formiga-leão Myrmeleon brasiliensis (Návas) (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae), em uma Reserva Florestal, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul. Neotropical Entomology 35 (4): 812 814.

MACCLURE, M. S. 1976. Spatial distribution of pit-marking antlion (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae): density effects. Biotropica 8: 179-183.

MISSIRIAN, G. B.; UCHÔA-FERNANDES, M. A.; FISCHER, E. 2006. Development of Myrmeleon brasiliensis (Navás) (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae), in laboratory, with different natural diets. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23 (4): 1044-1050.

NAPOLITANO, J. F. 1998. Predatory behavior of a pit-marking antlion, Myrmelon mobilis (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Florida Entomologist 81: 562-566.

NILSSON, P. A. 2006. Avoid your neighbors: size-determined spatial distribution patterns among northern pike individuals. Oikos: 435-440.

PRADO, I. F. L.; BEDÊ, L. C.; FARIA, M. L. 1993. Asymmetric competition of antlion larvae. Oikos 68: 525-530.

SCHARF, I.; BARKAE, E. D.; OVADIA, O. 2010. Response of pit-building antlions to repeated unsuccessful encounters with prey. Animal Behaviour 79: 153-158.

SCHARF, I.; NULMAN, E.; OVADIA, O.; BOUSKILA, A. 2006. Efficiency Evaluation of Two Competing Foraging Modes under Different Conditions. The American Naturalist 168 (3): 350357.